International Graduates’ Career Impact Estimated at $1.7 Trillion in New Study
A new study by Studyportals and Cambridge IELTS estimates that international graduates from the 2024 cohort could generate US$1.7 trillion in economic output over their working lives in countries where they studied.…
A new study by Studyportals and Cambridge IELTS estimates that international graduates from the 2024 cohort could generate US$1.7 trillion in economic output over their working lives in countries where they studied. The projection draws on international graduate outcomes and covers 15 major study destinations; it is a modelled estimate, not money already earned.
International Graduates’ Career Impact Estimated at $1.7 Trillion in New Study
A new international education study estimates that graduates from the 2024 cohort who remain employed in the countries where they studied could contribute US$1.7 trillion in economic output over their working lives. The figure is a forecast, not a measurement of income or taxes already generated.
The report, Talent Beyond Borders, was developed by Studyportals and Cambridge IELTS and announced on 15 October. It draws on a dataset covering more than half a million international graduates and focuses its economic modelling on 15 major study destinations, where comparable information is available.
The researchers classify graduates into three broad pathways: 41% remain in the country where they studied, 35% return home and 24% move to a third country. The headline economic estimate concerns the first group, whose later employment creates output in their study destinations. It does not describe the career earnings of every international student.
According to the analysis, the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and Canada account for almost 60% of the first-year output estimated for graduates who stay. The study also examines employment in medicine, engineering and information technology.
The authors argue that assessing international education solely through tuition fees and spending during study misses longer-term labour-market effects. As a model based on observed patterns and assumptions about future careers, its totals should be read as estimates rather than guaranteed outcomes.